Categorizing
species can get especially hazy at small, microbial scales. After all, the
classical definition of species as interbreeding individuals with sexually
viable offspring doesn't apply to asexual organisms. Examining shared DNA
doesn't help either: collectively, E. coli bacteria have only 20 percent of
genes in common. The classification process gets even trickier as many microbes
work so closely that it is unclear what to call separate organisms, let alone
separate species.
The
woes of classification generate contentious debates in the biology community.
But, for postdoctoral fellow Mikhail Tikhonov, one field's contentious debate
is another's theoretical playground. In new research, he asks: Could organism
interactions be described without mentioning species at all?
Key
question: “how does evolution act on the structure within a community, rather
than on a species?"
This
question is not only interesting on a theoretical level, but could have
real-world implications in understanding and treating human disease. While some
diseases (like pneumonia or meningitis) have specific culprits, many others
(like obesity or type II diabetes) seem to be associated to a community-level
dysfunction of our microbiome -- the highly diverse bacterial communities that
live on and inside our bodies. To understand these diseases, researchers must
understand how the system works as a whole.
See:
Mikhail Tikhonov. Theoretical
microbial ecology without species. Physical Review E,
2017; 96 (3) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032410
Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle
No comments:
Post a Comment
Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources