Thursday, 16 July 2020

Review of the efficacy of HEPA filtered air to control coronavirus risks in cleanrooms



The risk of viral transmission in the built environment is a matter of concern in the era of the novel coronavirus pandemic, for most of society, given that humans spent the majority of their time indoors. For pharmaceuticals and healthcare, there is an additional concern about working in cleanrooms and the degree to which protective measures are appropriate. With cleanrooms, an important concern is with the efficacy of HEPA filters. This article looks at the risks stemming from SARS-CoV-2 and applies these to the cleanroom context. The article concludes that the cleanroom environment does not contribute to the risk of viral transmission, and certain design aspects can, in fact, reduce the risk compared with other built environments.

Tim Sandle has written a new paper. The reference is:

Sandle, T. (2020) Review of the efficacy of HEPA filtered air to control coronavirus risks in cleanrooms, European Journal of Parenteral and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Volume 25 Issue 2 https://www.ejpps.online/  https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps

The article indicates that working within a cleanroom does not increase the risk of viral transmission. Given that viruses are commonly associated with larger particles (forming complexes with water, proteins, salts, and so on) in a range of sizes, most of which cannot penetrate high efficiency filters, the risk of ingress into cleanrooms is low. Within the cleanroom, protective measures include personnel behaviours and gowning, coupled with frequent glove sanitisation. Furthermore, ventilation, in terms of higher air exchange rates, is also important in reducing the transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2.  

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Wednesday, 15 July 2020

FDA: GMP and COVID-19



The U.S. FDA has published guidance (dated June 19, 2020) detailing the agency’s recommendations for current good manufacturing practices (CGMP) requirements for addressing COVID-19 infection in employees engaging in drug manufacturing. The guidance was issued to help mitigate and prevent effects on drug safety and quality by employees confirmed to be either infected with COVID-19 or potentially exposed to someone with COVID-19.
According to FDA:

“As with any potential new risk, FDA expects pharmaceutical manufacturers to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 poses contamination risks under existing manufacturing controls that prevent drug contamination and whether the virus adversely impacts drug safety or quality should contamination occur”.

Some of the recommendations presented in the guidance document are to prevent contamination of drugs from COVID-19-infected employees include cleaning and sanitizing non-production areas more frequently; updating cleaning and sanitizing procedures for production areas; expanding existing procedures to include gloves, face masks, and/or gowning if not already in place; and restricting employee access to manufacturing areas.

The document is titled ‘Good Manufacturing Practice Considerations for Responding to COVID-19 Infection in Employees in Drug and Biological Products Manufacturing - Guidance for Industry’. At: https://www.fda.gov/media/139299/download

What does it say?

COVID-19 specific:

1.      Each manufacturer must have a COVID-19 risk assessment in place, approved by Quality.
2.      Drug manufacturers must monitor employees who perform drug manufacturing functions and have been exposed to others with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 for symptoms of COVID-19 infection.
3.      Personnel who either test positive for COVID-19 (regardless of whether they have symptoms) or have symptoms of COVID-19 must be excluded from drug manufacturing areas.
4.      Employees in ‘1’ or ‘2’ above must practice self-isolation. FDA only accepts CDC measures rather than national health agencies.
5.      All employees must practice good sanitation and health habits.
6.      Each manufacturer must:
a.       Evaluate the adequacy of the GMP controls already in place to protect materials, components, drug container closures, in-process materials, and/or drugs from sick employees in the context of this new coronavirus. 
b.      Manufacturers must review cleanroom process controls such as air filtration, positive air pressure and movement of air to ensure proper function.  This may mean faster responses when cleanroom control measures breakdown.
c.       Manufacturers must consider the likelihood of contamination or cross-contamination to other drugs in the facility. 
d.      Current microbiological controls like closed system processing (isolators) should be sufficient to protect the drugs. Where the is no barrier technology in place, additional controls may be required to eliminate or minimize the risk of contamination.
e.        Potential risks from SARS-CoV-2 are likely to be mitigated by existing viral control strategies.  However, FDA recommends that manufacturers perform a risk assessment of the current viral control strategy in light of SARS-CoV-2 and implement appropriate mitigation strategies.
                                                              i. Drug manufacturers should determine if SARS-CoV-2 could adversely affect the safety or quality of their materials, components, drug product containers and closures, in-process materials, and drugs if they were to become contaminated with the virus. 
                                                            ii. The risk assessment should consider the known characteristics and studies of this family of viruses as well as the drug types and their characteristics (e.g., drug product or API, sterile, non-sterile, solids, powders, liquids, large or small molecule).
f.        Additional controls need to be in place for procedures taking place in open systems (e.g., buffer and culture media preparation areas).
g.      Manufacturers must update existing procedures to institute more frequent cleaning, sanitization, and/or sterilization of surfaces in the production areas, particularly surfaces that are contacted frequently, such as door handles, equipment latches, bench/counter tops, and control panels.  Special attention should be paid to sanitizing/sterilizing equipment and product contact surfaces.
h.      Manufacturer must clean and sanitize nonproduction areas (such as offices, elevators, break rooms, changing rooms, and restrooms) more frequently. 
i.        Manufacturers should consider expanding existing procedures to include using gloves, face masks, and/or gowning where such measures were not previously required.
j.        Manufacturers should consider further restrictions on employee access to any manufacturing area, beyond that required by GMP regulations, to limit the possibility of contamination.
k.      If a potential or actual viral contamination event is identified, drug manufacturers must promptly clean, disinfect, sanitize, and if necessary, sterilize affected equipment, surfaces, production areas, and facilities, before resuming manufacturing. 
l.        If supplies of single-use masks and other garb used to control contamination during manufacturing are low, they should be prioritized for use in sterile manufacturing operations.


General advice:

1.      Any person shown at any time shown to have an apparent illness or open lesions that may adversely affect the safety or quality of drug products shall be excluded from direct contact with components, drug product containers, closures, in-process materials, and drug products until the condition is corrected or determined by competent medical personnel.
2.      All personnel must report to supervisory personnel any health conditions that may have an adverse effect on drug products. 
3.      Companies must provide adequate facilities to ensure the orderly handling of materials and equipment.
4.      Companies must put in place measures to prevent mix-ups.
5.      Measures must in place to prevent the prevention of contamination of equipment or product.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Monday, 13 July 2020

Putting the coronavirus into perspective




Dr. Tim Sandle looks at the latest known data, facts and recommendations about the ‘novel’ coronavirus, including how this might impact on current policies – particularly in terms of infection prevention and the use of appropriate disinfectants.

Dr Tim Sandle looks at the latest known data, facts and recommendations about the ‘novel’ coronavirus, including how this might impact on current policies – particularly in terms of infection prevention and the use of appropriate disinfectants.
The reference is:


For details, see: CSJ

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Sunday, 12 July 2020

Interview with a microbiologist


Tim Sandle has been interviewed by the Institute of Validation Technology as part of the ‘Meet the Board’ series (Dr Sandle is a regular contributor to the IVT Network).

Here is an extract:

What is your advice to people who want to begin publishing their work but are maybe a little too hesitant to start?

The trick is to start off with something small. The best approach depends on the field and subject matter. With pharmaceuticals and healthcare, writing on a new standard that has been published or describing a new method are good places to start, trying to sum up what the change is about. Much of it is similar to writing an essay at school: introduction, main section, and conclusion. In the introduction say what the article is about; the middle section discuss the subject (for a newish writer limiting this to three main points is a good way of structuring the body of the article); and then summarize at the end. And then proof read.

The subject needs to be something you’re interested in and you need to enjoy writing. Every style is different (varying from the formal to the informal) and there’s no right or wrong way: if you’ve communicated what you want, then it’s worked. The first article I wrote was about 20 years ago and it was about microbiology on the Internet (which, believe it or not, wasn’t in widespread use at the time!) surveying websites.


The full interview can be read here: IVT


Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Thursday, 9 July 2020

Best practices in environmental monitoring



This video provides an overview of the best practices in relation to environmental monitoring, providing microbiologists with a benchmark for their practices, as well as providing advice for those wishing to set up a programme or to take a programme to scale.



The webinar emphasises risk assessment and the importance of corrective and preventative actions. Topics discussed include: -

What environmental is and what it is not -
The objectives of environmental monitoring -
Contamination sources and risks -
Aspects to consider with EM methods -Rapid microbiological methods -Core elements of the EM programme – what, when and how often? -
Data and CAPA -
Profiling microbial contamination


 Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Wednesday, 8 July 2020

ASM Releases 2019-2020 Global Report



The American Society of Microbiology's Global Report highlighting international accomplishments in microbiology is now available. ASM's Global Public Health Programs unite scientists around the world as they face public health threats like COVID-19 exacerbated by a rapidly growing human population and increased global mobility. Since the inception of its Global Public Health Programs, ASM has provided training, mentorship and cost-effective solutions in 26 countries around the world.

To access see: https://asm.org/Articles/Global-Public-Health/2019-2020-ASM-Global-Impact-Report?utm_source=RealMagnet&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ASM%5FNews%5F20200706&utm_campaign=Other%20Topics%20ASM%20News%20General

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Antimicrobial properties of copper



Copper – for many centuries known for its antimicrobial properties – is increasingly being used in hospitals and other healthcare facilities worldwide as an aid to infection control and reducing healthcare associated infections. This article discusses how antimicrobial surfaces incorporating copper can assist with hospital infection control programmes and the fight against nosocomial infection.
Tim Sandle has written a new article on the antimicrobial properties of copper:

Sandle., T. (2017) Combining copper with effective hygiene, Health Estate Journal, October 2017, pp43-46

For a copy, please contact Tim Sandle

 Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Best Practices in Environmental Monitoring - Reviewing your Process for Compliance



This video provides an overview of the best practices in relation to environmental monitoring, providing microbiologists with a benchmark for their practices, as well as providing advice for those wishing to set up a programme or to take a programme to scale.

The webinar emphasises risk assessment and the importance of corrective and preventative actions. Topics discussed include: -

What environmental is and what it is not -
The objectives of environmental monitoring -
Contamination sources and risks -
Aspects to consider with EM methods -Rapid microbiological methods -Core elements of the EM programme – what, when and how often? -
Data and CAPA -
Profiling microbial contamination


Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Tuesday, 7 July 2020

Pathogen biogeography: using a new model to predict disease outbreaks



Data-driven approaches to disease tracking and assessment are often used in predicting and preventing the spread of pathogens, as well as assessing whether a disease outbreak will occur and what the probable impact will be on a given population. Such approaches have been made easier through the digital capture of data and facilitated through forms of artificial intelligence such as machine learning. However, while the quality of data remains a key factor, any attempt of infectious disease prediction rests with the robustness of the model. An emerging area that appears to offer strong predictive power is pathogen biogeography.

Tim Sandle has written a new article for Infectious Disease Hub. The article can be found here.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Monday, 6 July 2020

Rogue Biological Indicators: Are They A Real Phenomenon?



Sometimes, unexplained results occur when using biological indicators with sterilization or decontamination processes. This could be attributable to a failure of the sterilization process or, perhaps, due to a mishandling of the biological indicator. Other reasons can be traced to issues of resistance and variations with the biological indicator itself (the effect of ‘creeping resistance’ has been described by some microbiologists to indicate a steady rising of D-values). Atypical results are seemingly more common with hydrogen peroxide vapor cycles (commonly used for isolator bio-decontamination) compared with sterilization cycles based on moist heat. In relation to hydrogen peroxide, another reason for atypical results is due to the occurrence of a rogue biological indicator, and it with this that this paper focuses on.

Tim Sandle has written a new article.

Here is an extract:

A rogue biological indicator is a term applied to a biological indicator which survives a hydrogen peroxide vapor cycle when perhaps it should not, based on the cycle parameters meeting previously established satisfactory profiles and in relation the known characteristics of the organism (that is, all cells should theoretically have been killed). When a positive biological indicator occurs (as evidenced by turbidity in culture media) it is impossible to determine whether the biological indicator met the definition of a ‘rogue’ (where a rogue can occur due to the overlaying of bacterial endospores on the carrier, as well as other reasons, as discussed in the main body of this paper).

As a note of caution, there are various reasons for isolator cycle failures outside of the rogue biological indicator situation and the automatic assumption should be that the reason for a cycle failure is due to a rogue event. As the rogue event assumes a ‘false positive’, the logical steps is to attempt to disprove the ‘false positive’ and to identify an alternative reason for the failure (that is the assumption that the failure is genuine). If no other reason can be attributed then, and only then, should the possibility of the rogue biological indicator be assumed. These issues are explored below.


The reference is:

Sandle, T. (2020) Rogue Biological Indicators: Are They A Real Phenomenon?, Journal of Validation Technology, 26 (1):

For details, please contact Tim Sandle

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Sunday, 5 July 2020

EU GMP Annex 1: What The ‘Final’ Draft Reveals



This paper reviews the new of EU GMP Annex 1 draft. In doing so the focus is on those aspects that are different to the 2017 draft, rather than spending much time comparing the 2020 draft with the current Annex 1 (which is dated 2009). 

Readers wishing to do this can refer to the 2018 Journal of GxP Compliance review. The reader should note that this paper contains some personal commentary at different points, either in praise of some of the updates or raising concerns about things that have not been changed which should have or with reference to some of the new things that have been added. 

Of course, the reader may not agree but the change is highlighted some that due consideration can be given.

The core focus with the revision is:


  • The global acceptance and implementation of ICH Q9 (Quality Risk Management) (8) and Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System), is not reflected in the current Annex. The new draft contains many references to Quality Risk Management (QRM) in particular, emphasizing that QRM should be used as a proactive tool. There are now 92 instances of the word “risk” in the new draft, an increase from 20 in the previous version.
  • There have been advances in sterile manufacturing technology, especially with RABS and isolators. There have also been advances with rapid microbiological methods, which the draft Annex acknowledges.
  • There was some ambiguity with the current version and these needed correction or clarification
  • Annex 1 is often beyond sterile manufacturing, including aspects of non-sterile manufacturing. The scope of the new draft has been modified to reflect this.
  • There is the requirement for a formal, holistic contamination control strategy (which is now abbreviated to ‘CCS’ in the new draft). The expectation now appears to be for a formal document which reflects the site-wide strategy for minimizing contamination control with respect to sterile manufacturing. The requirements of the contamination control strategy have been widened (43 mentions, up from 19 in the 2017 draft), however, with the new draft, extending to the need to fully-understand and review design, procedural, technical and organizational controls. With the term ‘contamination’ it remains that contamination is used too broadly, and it would be useful if, for example, there was a specific microbiological concern that the nature of the contamination is referred to directly. 


The reference is:

Sandle, T. (2020) EU GMP Annex 1: What The ‘Final’ Draft Reveals, Journal of GxP Compliance, 24 92), at: https://www.ivtnetwork.com/article/eu-gmp-annex-1-what-%E2%80%98final%E2%80%99-draft-reveals

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Saturday, 4 July 2020

Imbalance of gut bacteria linked to bowel cancer



New research suggests that a bacterium commonly found in the gut may, under particular conditions, release a toxin that triggers mutations in the cells found in the lining of the gut and this can lead to bowel cancer.
A bacterium commonly found human intentions could contribute to bowel cancer, under specific conditions, according to new research. The data reveals that a toxin called colibactin, released by a strain of Escherichia coli, triggers unique patterns, or 'fingerprints', of DNA that can cause damage to the cells lining the gut through a process called tumorigenesis.
The reason why there appears to be a connection is because the molecular fingerprints have also been detected in bowel cancer tumours. This evidence indicates a connection between a specific bacterial toxin and the types of genetic changes that are associated with cancer development. A further indication of the connection is with colibactin being frequently isolated from the faeces of cancer patients.
The research team ran experiments using human cells in the laboratory, showing what the effects of the colibactin are. The experimental results confirmed the hypothesis.
The implications of the research suggest that medics should focus on reducing the presence of high-risk bacteria in the gut. However, for the current time those concerned should continue to focus on exercise and with consuming a healthy diet. For those of a certain age (over 55 years is considered to be a higher risk group), it is recommended that they take part in bowel cancer screening
The research study has been published in the science journal Nature. The research paper is titled "Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks E. coli."
Parallel work conducted by the Hubrecht Institute has shown that cancer mutations of the colon can also be triggered by genotoxic E. coli, through the organisms inducing a unique mutational pattern in human DNA. As with the bowel cancer study, colibactin was the attributable cause.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Friday, 3 July 2020

The Survival of Coronavirus Sars-Cov-2 On Surfaces and Designing Disinfection Strategies to Eliminate the Virus



Coronaviridae specificities such as pathogenicity and potential environmental resistance, make them a challenging model for the development of efficient means of prevention. The virus is relatively infectious; current data suggests that each infection results in 1.4 to 3.9 new ones (based on the basic reproduction  number or R0 value) when no members of the community are immune and no preventive measures taken.

While most people are practicing ‘social distancing’ (or, more accurately, ‘physical distancing’) and carry out other measures to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, like regular handwashing or hand sanitization, it is also important to ensure that surfaces are regularly cleaned and disinfected. This paper focuses on viral survival on surfaces and appropriate forms of disinfection for those working in the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors, drawing on the literature published to date.


Sandle, T. (2019) The Survival of Coronavirus Sars-Cov-2 On Surfaces and Designing Disinfection Strategies to Eliminate the Virus, Journal of Validation Technology, 26 (2).

See: https://www.ivtnetwork.com/article/survival-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-surfaces-and-designing-disinfection-strategies-eliminate-vir

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Thursday, 2 July 2020

Consideration of Covid-19 Prevention Measures For Those Working In GMP Pharmaceuticals And Healthcare Facilities



Aside from expelled droplets through coughing and sneezing, it is not yet established if the virus survives long-term in the air and hence whether it can be classified as ‘airborne.’   This article then considers the measures that employers within the pharmaceutical and healthcare need to have in place in order to maintain staff safety and welfare. Whilst continuing to ensure that Good Manufacturing (GMP) standards are met.


The article also considers the measures that employers within the pharmaceutical and healthcare need to have in place in order to maintain staff safety and welfare. Whilst continuing to ensure that Good Manufacturing (GMP) standards are met. While the focus is on the causative agent of COVID-19, the information presented will help for assessing future pathogen outbreaks where additional public health measures are required.

Sandle, T. (2019) Consideration of Covid-19 Prevention Measures For Those Working In GMP Pharmaceuticals And Healthcare Facilities, Journal of Validation Technology, 26 (2).

See: https://www.ivtnetwork.com/article/consideration-covid-19-prevention-measures-those-working-gmp-pharmaceuticals-and-healthcare-

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Wednesday, 1 July 2020

COVID-19: Optimal disinfection choices at this challenging time



The respiratory disease, COVID-19, is having a significant global impact, with infection numbers and mortality rates increasing by the day. Investigations are ongoing to try to learn more about this new coronavirus, and clinical trials have commenced in relation to both improved detection tests and with developing vaccines. News reports across multiple platforms, particularly social media, often appear to give conflicting opinions.


Looking at the importance of cleaning and disinfection to address the virus, Tim Sandle has written an article:

Sandle, T. (2020) Optimal disinfection choices at this challenging time, Health Estate Journal, May 2020, pp50-52: https://www.healthestatejournal.com/story/32648/optimal-disinfection-choices-at-this-challenging-time

What is unquestionable is the vital role played by taking robust infection prevention and control measures in healthcare facilities. However, with so many cleaning and disinfection products to choose from, and with limited time for research, this article aims to give an overview for anyone involved in health estates and facilities management of the key considerations when selecting the optimum cleaning products.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Special offers