The
following article of interest has been posted by Cleanroom Technology.
Source: CleanroomTechnology
Following
a recent meeting, a decision has been taken by the international cleanroom
community to move forward with the work to revise ISO 14698 – Cleanroom
Biocontamination Control.
The
standard will seek to establish control requirements such as the important
environmental quality attributes. It will also refer to test methods and
validation, including assessment of environmental monitoring equipment like air
samplers. There will also be a section on data handling.
The
main changes to ISO 14698 under discussion are:
- · A new classification system for viable counts, split into surface and air cleanliness,
- · Guidance for assessing cleanrooms at start-up or after modifications for bioburden, in a similar way that cleanrooms are currently assessed for particle counts,
- · Guidance on viable monitoring methods,
- · Recommendations for data analysis.
The
vote was accepted with 13 countries giving ‘Yes’ votes and only the USA ANSI
team voting ‘No’.
The
countries that voted a ‘Yes’ in support of this work were Brazil (ABNT),
Germany (DIN), China (SAC), France (AFNOR), Japan (JISC), Sweden (SIS), Italy
(UNI), Korea, Republic of (KATS), Ireland (NSAI), Switzerland (SNV),
Netherlands (NEN), Denmark (DS), UK (BSI). Twelve of the countries are putting
forward experts to take part (Korea is not sending an expert).
The
US team has stated it will no longer be putting forward an expert for the
ongoing work on this document.
The
standard is seen by some in the US as adding unnecessary cost to industry. In
addition the US Pharmacopoeia Chapter <1116> "Microbiological
Evaluation of Clean Rooms and Other Controlled Environments”, which has only
recently been updated, would possibly be at variance with some of the resulting
ISO revisions.
Speaking
about the potential revisions, Tim Sandle, Head of Microbiology, BPL, considers
that one aim of the revised standard – to have a viable classification approach
for cleanrooms – requires further discussion. “Cleanrooms are clean if verified
by their physical parameters and remain so provided people do not enter them.
The current thinking of orientating monitoring locations and frequencies
towards risk seems a more sensible approach. Another aspect, to have an average
count for a clean area on classification, stands in contrast to the current USP
approach that looks at incident rates.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources