Currently, many different methods have
been developed for subspecies typing of Staphylococcus
aureus. However, there is no “ideal” one because of its disadvantages and
thus there is no commonly accepted guidelines for the selection of the optimal
typing method for epidemiological investigations. The aim of the study was an
in silico comparison of widely used typing methods, including Multilocus
sequence typing (MLST), Staphylococcus
aureus Protein A (spa) typing, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE),
Multiple Locus Variable-number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) and whole genome
multilocus sequence typing (wgMLST), in terms of discriminatory power and
coefficients congruence. Quantitative assessment of discriminatory power and
correlation of five typing methods: wgMLST, PFGE, MLST, MLVA and spa typing was
performed, by targeting the different sites of the Staphylococcus aureus genome (which had evolved at different rates).
This is the basis of a new article of
interest. The reference is:
Babenko, A., Turmuhambetova, A., Sandle,
T. and Chesca, A. (2016) In silico comparison of molecular typing methods for
characterization of Staphylococcus
aureus, Acta Medica Mediterranea, 32: 1021-1027
The article can be accessed here.
The article can be accessed here.
Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle
No comments:
Post a Comment
Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources