Showing posts with label Bioburden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bioburden. Show all posts

Tuesday, 2 July 2024

Means, ranges and replicates: Improving microbial plate counting


 

A microbial colony is a visible cluster of microorganisms growing on the surface of or within a solid medium. This may be from a single cell or an amalgam of the same organism of one than one cell or a mix of different organisms. Bioburden levels are commonly measured, when conventional methods are deployed, in terms of colony-forming units (CFUs). These units provide an estimation of the number of viable bacteria or fungal cells found on a sample, expressed against a unit of measurement (such as per milliliter or per milligram).

When counting CFUs on solid microbiological culture media (agar) there are some aspects of ‘counting’ that need to be considered. These are:

a) Rounding and averaging

b) Significant figures

c) Countable range

d) Statistical error from low counts

This week’s article looks at each of these aspects of the microbial plate count. 

See:  https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/means-ranges-replicates-improving-microbial-plate-tim-kbxke/

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Monday, 15 January 2024

Approaching bioburden testing: Pointers for a successful approach


 

Bioburden refers to the microbial content of a material (or on the surface). It can also refer to the microbial levels within the environment. For non-sterile products, understanding the level and types of microorganisms together with the route of administration and intended patient population is of great importance. For sterile pharmaceutical products knowing the bioburden during manufacturing, from the cleanroom environment, and immediately prior to sterilisation are of importance in order to have confidence that the sterilisation step will be effective or that aseptic filling begins with an unadulterated bulk. This article considers the scientific basis to bioburden testing.


By Tim Sandle


In relation to assessing the level of microbial content during processing, bioburden testing refers to an estimation of the numbers of bacteria and fungi present in a liquid sample. This is commonly assessed using the Total Viable Count (TVC) method, whereby a portion of the material is plated out onto agar or mixed with agar and the incubated to assess microbial growth. 

 

To assess growth the common TVC methods are membrane filtration (where a portion of material or a rinse of the material is passed through a microbially retentive membrane filter); pour plate; and spread plate. Due to the larger size of material that can be tested and due to the relative ease of eliminating any antimicrobial activity, membrane filtration is the method of choice and the other methods are deployed only where a material cannot be filtered. With the advent of rapid microbiological methods, alternatives are available to some of these traditional growth-based methods.

 

With the conventional methods, the method of reporting a result from a test is by colony forming units (CFU) per unit of testing (typically CFU per mL or per 100 mL). A colony forming unit does not necessarily equate with a number of microorganisms present in the sample but it does provide an indicator of the bioburden load. This is because a colony forming unit (CFU) is an estimate of one or more microbial cells which, on the introduction of microbial growth media, can form macro-colonies under the conditions of the test. One colony forming unit is expressed as 1 CFU.

 

In relation to pharmaceutical processing, bioburden testing is implemented in order to assess the quality of the starting materials and to track process hygiene as the product is being manufactured. With non-sterile products a bioburden assessment is additionally required of the final product. Here it is expected that such products will contain a level of bioburden, therefore what matters is how many microorganisms are present and which species are present. With sterile products an assessment is required up until the point where a product is sterilised (either terminally sterilised or filtered and then aseptically filled).

 

In drawing up a bioburden test regime a number of factors need to be considered. These include:

 

  • The time of sampling (in order to assess process hold times, sampling normally occurs at the end of the process in order to assess any growth of microorganisms).
  • Sample homogeneity (where possible, samples are taken from a homogenous bulk. This means, that where there is a process mixing step, samples are taken post-mixing).
  • Sampling handling and aseptic technique.
  • The use of sterile sampling containers.
  • Selection of test methods and verification of method suitability (this includes the appropriate test agar and incubation times).
  • The expiry time of the sample (what is the last point in time when the sample can be tested and a ‘valid’ result be obtained?)
  • Assignment of alert and action levels.

 

In relation to the environment, this is assessed through microbiological monitoring using active air-samplers, settle plates and contact plates, supported by particle counting.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Resources (http://www.pharmamicroresources.com/)

Monday, 26 September 2016

Improving bioburden testing


Tim Sandle has written an article for European Pharmaceutical Review about improving assurance in relation to microbial bioburden assessments. This relates to the use of biocontainer bags, designed to reduce the chance of false positives occurring.

Assessment of microbial levels in (and on) samples is an important part of pharmaceutical process control. Samples are drawn from intermediate product at defined stages (ideally based on risk assessment) and these allow for the microbial levels to be tracked from upstream processing to downstream processing (with an expectation that the microbial levels decrease, or at least remain unchanged provided they are below an acceptable action level). For aseptically products, European guidelines require a certain bioburden to be met at the point that a bulk product passes through a sterilising grade filter.

Due to the relatively low specification – of 10 CFU/100mL – pharmaceutical manufacturers need to ensure that false positive results are avoided (as might arise from extraneous environmental contamination). False positives can result in batch rejection. A key innovation, in recent years, is the biocontainer sampling bag. This item of irradiated plastic is in keeping with moves towards single use, sterile processing technology.

The article examines the importance of bioburden testing, particularly in relation to aseptically filled products, together with the most important criteria for sampling bags.

Sandle, T. (2016) Improving microbiological assurance for bioburden tests, European Pharmaceutical Review, 21 (3): 41-44

The article can be viewed via the European Pharmaceutical Review website.

Posted by Dr. Tim Sandle

Monday, 11 January 2016

Process Hold Times for Microbial Risks



A new paper about the microbiological risks of holding product at different stages during the pharmaceutical manufacturing process has been issued. The abstract runs:

This paper has discusses the implications of the process hold times on microbial growth during pharmaceutical manufacturing. Microbiological risk exists -- especially with biological products. If microbial contamination occurs where microorganisms enter a product in sufficient numbers and if the process hold time is long enough, the process hold time may be problematic.


Sandle, T. (2015) Assessing Process Hold Times for Microbial Risks: Bioburden and Endotoxin, Journal of GXP Compliance, Vol. 19, Issue 3, Oct 2015, pp1-9

For further details, please contact Tim Sandle

Posted by Tim Sandle

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

A new standard for bioburden testing

The USP has proposed a new standard for bioburden testing (USP chapter 1115). The main basis of the chapter is setting out a risk based approach to monitor and control a manufacturing facility for the processing of non-sterile products.

To examine the implications of the proposed chapter, and in a review of bioburden issues in general, Tim Sandle has written an article for the GMP Review.

The reference is:

Sandle, T. (2013). A new standard for bioburden testing: USP chapter in development, GMP Review, 12 (3): 10-12

For further details, please contact Tim Sandle

Posted by Tim Sandle

Monday, 4 November 2013

Optimal recovery of bioburden from pharmaceutical products

Bioburden testing is an important part of pharmaceutical microbiology and provides data in relation to the quality of pharmaceutical products during manufacture. Little guidance is provided in relation to test methodology, culture media and incubation parameters. The quality control laboratory, therefore, needs to establish the most appropriate method.

With this in mind, Tim Sandle and colleagues have written a paper which outlines a case study for the selection of incubation parameters for the bioburden assessment of in-process samples using the Total Viable Count technique and pour plate method.

While the outcome of the experiment contained within the paper relates to a specific set of processes, the approach taken can be used by other laboratories to compare or to develop their test methods and techniques for bioburden determinations.

The reference is:

Sandle, T., Skinner, K. and Yeandle, E. (2013). Optimal conditions for the recovery of bioburden from pharmaceutical processes: a case study, European Journal of Parenteral and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18 (3): 84-91

For those interested in reading the paper, please contact TimSandle.

Posted by Tim Sandle

Tuesday, 20 August 2013

USP Chapter 1115 Bioburden Control


After several years of discussion and debate the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) has issued a draft of a proposed new chapter: USP <1115> “Bioburden Control of Nonsterile Drug Substances and Products”. The draft has been released in the Pharmacopeial Forum July/August, 2013.


By appearing in the Pharmacopeial Forum the draft chapter is presented to the industry for comment, with a view to a final chapter being published sometime in 2014. The main basis to the chapter is the setting out of a risk-based approach to monitor and control of the manufacturing facility and process for non-sterile pharmaceutical products. These are important concerns for bioburden has been cited by the U.S. FDA in several warning letters over the past ten years in relation to batch rejection and recall*.

Scott Sutton has more information about the new chapter, including a link to a copy on the Microbiology Network: to view please click here.

*See: Sandle, T. (2012). Review of FDA warning letters for microbial bioburden issues (2001-2011), Pharma Times, Vol. 44, No.12, pp29-30



Posted by Tim Sandle

Special offers